![]() A semicolon says "increase the rank of the next item by the big-step value". Second, the user can include a semicolon in a want list. This sets how much the rank increases when you move from one position to the next. First, the moderator can set the SMALL-STEP= num option. ![]() The simple case can be altered in two ways. In other words, the first wanted item has rank 1, the second wanted item has rank 2, and so on. In the simplest case, rank is equal to the position of the item in the list. In SCALED-PRIORITIES, cost = 1 + (rank-1)*2520/number of wants.In SQUARE-PRIORITIES, cost = rank*rank.In TRIANGLE-PRIORITIES, cost = 1+2+.+rank = rank*(rank+1)/2.The cost is then calculated as a function of rank. In particular, it finds the set of trades that has the minimum total cost, where total cost is the sum of the costs of all the individual items traded.Īll priority schemes begin by finding the rank of each wanted item in a want list. The system then uses cost as a tie-breaker among different ways of achieving the maximum number of trades. When using priorities, each wanted item in a want list is assigned a certain cost, where lower cost means higher priority. The moderator can choose to use priorities by specifying a priority scheme as an option (eg, LINEAR-PRIORITIES). She is still contributing, but not as much as before, and she is no longer listed as an admin in the community portal (where all official roles are listed) - though she still has full admin privileges of course, like she does on every other wiki on the Gamepedia domain (being a key staff member).By default, TradeMaximizer does not use priorities. We can't know for sure, but I suspect this is what is really going on, and she either stepped down due to disagreeing with it or being upset, not wanting to oversee such a development - or of course, that she simply has too much other stuff to do now on all the other wikis. ![]() And it would be sort of sensible from Wikia's point of view to get everything under one domain, and simply forward the traffic from the Gamepedia URLs. I'm just speculating and trying to read between the lines. She can't say that of course, and has said she doesn't have time any more. I too suspect it's due to internal pressure from their new overlords, with the hope of Gamepedia wikis getting inactive, and then they can in the next step kill them off entirely or co-opt the content into their embarrassingly named domain. On a related note, since I'm posting here for maybe the first time in a decade or something: I finally finished the game last year. It's allowed ofc given the various site/wiki policies, but. Yeah, they did that from gamepedia in the past, but I find it kinda morally dubious. But like Gilrond mentioned above, I don't feel it's the right move to simply copy articles over. What saddens me a bit, however, after looking at some pages over there recently, is that although the design is atrocious, some of the content is actually better on wikia than gamepedia. Unfortunate if users mostly go to the wikia one, but I'd not want to stick my neck into that nekker lair tbh. Therefore, the edits I've made have been done there. Not narrow as hell and not spam on 75% of the screenspace. To put it mildly, that's not a prospect I'd be ecstatic about. From their perspective, the longterm goal is probably to merge wikis into Wikia, hope the others become inactive, and then forcefeed the rest into Wikia. I'm quite frankly a bit concerned about the future of the official Gamepedia wiki given Wikia/Bandom wolfed down Curse, and the above-mentioned links. What was the censorship about now again? The "cards" from Witcher 1?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |